Difference between round-robin DNS and Route53 multivalue answers

Until now, if you want to load-balance traffic between multiple servers, you can either:

But Amazon just announced a few days ago they were adding a new type of routing policy for DNS records: multivalue answers, with support for health checks.

Basically this means that you can create multiple records for the same domain name, and associate each record with a different server IP and a health check that returns whether this server is up or not. Based on that, Route53 will reply to DNS queries for the domain name with just the IPs that are healthy, meaning that contrary to classic round-robin DNS, client programs will not see unhealthy IPs in the DNS response.


First, let's create two EC2 instances with a simple nginx server running on it, which returns the hostname of the server it is currently running on. For this test you can use a t2.nano instance, and setup the user-data to automatically install nginx and the default index.html page with this script:

set -e
apt-get update -qq && apt-get install -y nginx
hostname > /var/www/html/index.nginx-debian.html

Setup EC2 instance with user-data Our 2 servers are running

Next, you will need to create 2 Route53 health checks (one for each server):

Health check server 1 Health check server 2

For now the health check status is Unknown, but a few seconds after they should both switch to Healthy:

unknown healthhealthy!

You now have 2 servers, with the corresponding health checks. Let's create the final piece with the 2 DNS records, using the new multivalue answers policy:

dns record server 1dns record server 2

After a little while, both IPs should show in the dig report:

$ dig poor-man-lb.barebuild.com
poor-man-lb.barebuild.com. 60INA52.23.222.220
poor-man-lb.barebuild.com. 60INA52INA34.227.93.176

Now, if you stop one of the servers, after about 1 min (or lower if you set a TTL < 60s, which is probably a good idea if you're using this policy) the unhealthy host should disappear:

$ dig poor-man-lb.barebuild.com
poor-man-lb.barebuild.com. 60sINA52.23.222.220

Is it useful?

This is definitely no replacement for a proper load-balancer, but if you have a large number of backend servers and/or dumb clients that only try the first (or first N) IPs returned, this can prove useful as you don't run the risk of exposing unhealthy servers in your DNS replies.

Although nowadays, in a round-robin DNS setup, all browsers, cURL, etc. are able to try the other IPs until one connects, but again you never know what old stack/program your clients may be using to connect to your service, so using this new Route53 policy puts you on the safe there. Also, keeping unhealthy IPs in DNS replies is probably not that great performance-wise, as the client will have to potentially try to connect to multiple IPs before being able to send a request.